Re: doc - add missing documentation for "acldefault"

From: Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>, Pavel Luzanov <p(dot)luzanov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: doc - add missing documentation for "acldefault"
Date: 2018-09-24 13:45:23
Message-ID: 00c0446b-32a5-9a26-b70e-1881591f3c81@joeconway.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 09/21/2018 01:51 PM, Joe Conway wrote:
> On 09/19/2018 11:18 AM, Joe Conway wrote:
>> On 09/19/2018 10:54 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> So maybe what we really need is a table of operators not functions.
>>
>> Good idea -- I will take a look at that.
>>
>>> However, I don't object to documenting any function that has its
>>> own pg_description string.
>
> Ok, so the attached version refactors/splits the group into two tables
> -- operators and functions.

<snip>

> I also included John Naylor's patch with some minor editorialization.
>
> Any further comments or complaints?

Having seen none, committed/pushed. This did not seem worth
back-patching, so I only pushed to master.

Joe

--
Crunchy Data - http://crunchydata.com
PostgreSQL Support for Secure Enterprises
Consulting, Training, & Open Source Development

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Hubert Zhang 2018-09-24 13:56:08 Re: Proposal for disk quota feature
Previous Message Chris Travers 2018-09-24 13:16:46 Re: Proposal for Signal Detection Refactoring