Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] prob with aggregate and group by - returns multiplesh

----- Original Message -----
From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>; 'pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org'
<pgsql-sql(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>; PostgreSQL Development
<pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Sent: Wednesday, March 01, 2000 6:18 AM
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] prob with aggregate and group by -
returns multiplesh

> > > So are we willing to field questions from people trying to use
TEMP
> > > tables and trying TEMP and not TEMPORARY. I realize the
restriction on
> > > a field called TEMP, but we don't get those very often. How
many people
> > > are going to guess TEMP and not TEMPORARY?
> >
> > Well, that's one reason to stick to a published standard. No
guessing
> > required since one could look it up ;)
>
> If you survive reading the standard. :-)

If you can even *find* the standard :->

(is there an on-line source - all links I've ever seen 404ed...?)