| From: | "Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Joe Conway" <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | "pgsql-hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: SRF rescan testing |
| Date: | 2002-05-27 22:11:38 |
| Message-ID: | 009e01c205cb$79025090$3200a8c0@internal |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
> (OTOH one could make a good argument that now is the time to do it
> if we're ever gonna do it --- clients that are not schema-aware will
> be badly in need of work anyway for 7.3...)
Maybe the attisdropped column should be created and added to the
pg_attribute catalog now as well. It would always be false, but would mean
only 1 round of mad postgres admin program hacking... Might be able to
avoid catalog changes for a drop column implementation in 7.4...
Chris
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Manuel Sugawara | 2002-05-27 22:28:22 | Re: is there any backend timeout undocumented? |
| Previous Message | Joe Conway | 2002-05-27 21:56:07 | Re: revised sample SRF C function; proposed SRF API |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bear Giles | 2002-05-27 22:14:44 | Re: SSL (patch 5) |
| Previous Message | Bear Giles | 2002-05-27 22:00:16 | Re: SSL (patch 4) |