Re: tablespaces a priority for 7.5?

From: "Rick Gigger" <rick(at)alpinenetworking(dot)com>
To: "Cott Lang" <cott(at)internetstaff(dot)com>, <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: tablespaces a priority for 7.5?
Date: 2004-01-22 19:09:17
Message-ID: 009b01c3e11b$3c51b460$0700a8c0@trogdor
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general


> On Wed, 2004-01-21 at 09:05, Brian Maguire wrote:
>
> > In my opinion, it really is a critical feature to support and administer
> > enterprise databases. All the major databases currently support this
> > and it is a compelling enough reason drive big users from away from
> > using postgres for their enterprise/large databases. It really is a
> > database administrator's feature.
>
> It seems to me that the lack of point-in-time recovery is a much bigger
> roadblock against big users. :(

This is certainly my feeling.

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2004-01-22 19:11:31 Re: Lost plpgsql function
Previous Message Rick Gigger 2004-01-22 19:02:03 Re: embedded/"serverless" (Re: serverless postgresql)