Re: How to optimize monstrous query, sorts instead of

From: SZUCS Gábor <surrano(at)mailbox(dot)hu>
To: <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: How to optimize monstrous query, sorts instead of
Date: 2003-06-25 14:20:32
Message-ID: 009401c33b25$08520e90$0403a8c0@fejleszt4
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Michael,

Actually, you missed an alias :) the select now returned 800k rows!
(according to explain)

pointed it out below. See my prev mail for more.

If it's possible, try your query on a backend and look for notices like
"Adding missing FROM clause for table ..."

G.
------------------------------- cut here -------------------------------
----- Original Message -----
From: "Michael Mattox" <michael(dot)mattox(at)verideon(dot)com>
Cc: "Postgresql Performance" <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2003 4:09 PM

> from monitorx m, monitorstatusx ms, monitorstatusitemx msi
> where m.idx = 'M-TEST_1444-TEST_00_10560561260561463219352' AND
> monitorx.jdoidx = ms.monitorx AND
^^^^^^^^
substitute the same alias "m" here.

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Rod Taylor 2003-06-25 14:28:25 Re: How to optimize monstrous query, sorts instead of
Previous Message SZUCS Gábor 2003-06-25 14:15:53 Re: How to optimize monstrous query, sorts instead of using index