Re: 8.1.1.0, VB6, RDO, rdoResultset.RowCount

> this was discussed earlier today i think...
>
> the recordset has an EOF (end of file) flag. if rs.EOF equals False, then
> there are rows in the resultset.

Thanks and yes, EOF is indeed a much cleaner way for early testing of a
potentially empty resultset.
But now I have another disturbing situation, that came up during EOF
tests...
If I have a non-empty resultset, traveling all the way (using MoveNext)
until EOF is found doesn't produce a valid RowCount.
Only a MoveLast seems to do the job.

I created a five rows / two columns table, opened a 'select *' resultset and
performed the following sequence:

With ordoRs
.MoveFirst
While Not .EOF
Debug.Print .rdoColumns("f1"), .rdoColumns("f2"), .RowCount ' <----
RowCount is always equal to 0
.MoveNext
Wend
.MoveLast
Debug.Print , , .RowCount ' <---- RowCount is correct
End With

This seems somewhat dangerous to me, although I must say I never made a
similar test with any ODBC driver (as far as I can remember, I always used
MoveLast to get an accurate RowCount).

Helder M. Vieira