Re: VACUUM ANALYZE FAILS on 7.0.3

Your are correct !

#0 0x40171b80 in strcoll () at strcoll.c:228
#1 0x8115b1f in lztext_cmp ()
#2 0x8115b72 in lztext_eq ()
#3 0x8098809 in vacuum ()
#4 0x8096120 in vacuum ()
#5 0x8095705 in vacuum ()
#6 0x8094e9d in vacuum ()
#7 0x8094e21 in vacuum ()
#8 0x81000b3 in ProcessUtility ()
#9 0x80fd42c in pg_exec_query_dest ()
#10 0x80fd378 in pg_plan_query ()
#11 0x80fe465 in PostgresMain ()
#12 0x80e5b7b in PostmasterMain ()
#13 0x80e571c in PostmasterMain ()
#14 0x80e4889 in PostmasterMain ()
#15 0x80e420c in PostmasterMain ()
#16 0x80b571d in main ()
#17 0x4010ea7c in __libc_start_main (main=0x80b5670 <main>, argc=8,
ubp_av=0xbffffb24, init=0x80648b8 <_init>,
fini=0x814632c <_fini>, rtld_fini=0x4000d684 <_dl_fini>,
stack_end=0xbffffb1c) at ../sysdeps/generic/libc-start.c:111
----- Original Message -----
From: "Alfred Perlstein" <bright(at)wintelcom(dot)net>
To: "Dave Cramer" <Dave(at)micro-automation(dot)net>
Cc: <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>; <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2001 1:23 PM
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] VACUUM ANALYZE FAILS on 7.0.3

> * Dave Cramer <Dave(at)micro-automation(dot)net> [010124 09:08] wrote:
> > Tom,
> >
> > Thanks for the hint, and no I wasn't looking in the right place. Here is
the backtrace
>
> This isn't a backtrace, you need to actually type 'bt' to get a backtrace.
>
> -Alfred
>
>