Fw: Speed diff cause by multi-byte support

From: "Arsalan Zaidi" <azaidi(at)directi(dot)com>
To: <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Fw: Speed diff cause by multi-byte support
Date: 2002-03-28 06:24:10
Message-ID: 008901c1d621$2f32ae80$4301a8c0@directi.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general


Reposting...

Sorry about being so insistent, but I'd really like to know! :-)

--Arsalan.

----- Original Message -----
From: Arsalan Zaidi <azaidi(at)directi(dot)com>
To: <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 5:52 PM
Subject: [GENERAL] Speed diff cause by multi-byte support

> Hi.
>
> I read somewhere in the docs that turning on multi-byte support slows PG
> down.
>
> I was wondering. If I compile multi-byte support in and then use PG to
> access
> both a db initdb'ed with supprot for UNICODE and another one which uses
> plain
> ASCII, will there be a difference in speed between the two?
>
> Will PG run as normal with the ASCII db and slower with the UNICODE db or
> slower with both?
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
> --Arsalan.
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
> People often hate those things which they do not know, or cannot
understand.
> --Ali Ibn Abi Talib (A.S.)
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html
>

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas T. Thai 2002-03-28 06:53:32 PHP, PgSQL, stale Persistent connection
Previous Message Neil Conway 2002-03-28 06:09:49 Re: Why won't the query planner use my index?