Re: Re: VACUUM and 24/7 database operation

From: "Adam Lang" <aalang(at)rutgersinsurance(dot)com>
To: <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Re: VACUUM and 24/7 database operation
Date: 2001-01-24 15:03:19
Message-ID: 008801c08616$c95a1360$330a0a0a@6014cwpza006
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Any type of commerce or site that tracks user profiles... That's a LOT of
sites that would have a need for a enterprise level DB.

Remember, the goal is 5 nines uptime. :)

Adam Lang
Systems Engineer
Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company
http://www.rutgersinsurance.com
----- Original Message -----
From: "Steve Wolfe" <steve(at)iboats(dot)com>
To: <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Sent: Tuesday, January 23, 2001 3:52 PM
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Re: VACUUM and 24/7 database operation

> > Shouldn't it be possible to build vacuum as an ongoing internal PG
> process,
> > instead of a seperate operation? How does Oracle byepass this? Must be
> some
> > way that can be implemented.
>
> Well, here's what it comes down to: Do you want updates to happen
> quickly, and vacuum when load is low, or do you want updates to be slow
all
> the time? I suppose that there are some sites that can't find two minutes
> per day when updates will block (not selects), but I imagine they're very
> few.
>
> steve
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message clemens schmuck 2001-01-24 15:12:21 groups a user belongs to
Previous Message fabrizio.ermini 2001-01-24 15:00:35 Re: pleasing the corporate-types.