Re: [9.4 CF 1]Commitfest ... over!

From: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila(at)huawei(dot)com>
To: "'Josh Berkus'" <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [9.4 CF 1]Commitfest ... over!
Date: 2013-08-05 03:41:24
Message-ID: 008401ce918d$a9293770$fb7ba650$@kapila@huawei.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Saturday, August 03, 2013 5:17 AM Josh Berkus wrote:
> Folks,
>
> The first CF for the 9.4 development cycle is officially over.
>
> In all, 49 patches were committed, 47 were returned with feedback, 6
> were rejected outright, and 6 were punted to CF2. We're 17 days over
> the CF deadline at this point, but that's unsurprising considering that
> this CF included a record number of patches -- 108 patches at peak,
> compared with 59 for last year's CF1, and 101 for even CF4. So this
> was, measured strictly by patch count, the biggest CF ever (of course,
> that's not the only measure).
>
> See my blog at
> http://www.databasesoup.com/2013/08/94-commitfest-1-wrap-up.html for
> some additional details.
>
> Given that we can expect to be dealing with more patches per CF in the
> future, I'd like some feedback about what things would make the CF
> process more efficient. For that matter, for the first time we tried
> enforcing some of the "rules" of CFs this time, and I'd like to hear if
> people think that helped.

First of all Thank you very much for running a wonderful Commit Fest.
The best part according to me is that all patches got fair review comments/suggestions to improve.

With Regards,
Amit Kapila.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Etsuro Fujita 2013-08-05 04:58:55 Re: Patch for removng unused targets
Previous Message Tom Lane 2013-08-05 01:33:56 Re: PostgreSQL and ASLR on Linux