Re: WIP: CoC

From: "Regina Obe" <lr(at)pcorp(dot)us>
To: "'James Keener'" <jim(at)jimkeener(dot)com>, "'Psql_General \(E-mail\)'" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: WIP: CoC
Date: 2016-01-12 01:54:55
Message-ID: 008301d14cdc$3c538e40$b4faaac0$@pcorp.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general


> That has nothing to do with the Code of Conduct, though. The community accepting Tom saying "no" to Feature X is vastly different than the community not calling Tom out for being mean.

> The CoC is about the later situation and not the prior; and the community should call Tom out. (I'm sure you're a great person, Tom, sorry you're the example being used here.)

No. The Coc is about protecting Tom from abuse. I'm not worried about YOUR good intentions, I'm worried about their bad intentions

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2016-01-12 02:00:51 Re: Building PostgreSQL in Eclipse on Windows
Previous Message Igal @ Lucee.org 2016-01-12 01:50:59 plv8 binaries for PostgreSQL 9.5 on Windows