| From: | "Radu-Adrian Popescu" <radu(dot)popescu(at)aldratech(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Peter Darley" <pdarley(at)kinesis-cem(dot)com>, "Jeff Self" <jself(at)nngov(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "Pgsql-Admin" <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Journaling file systems |
| Date: | 2002-02-26 17:28:39 |
| Message-ID: | 007701c1beeb$07c641b0$0600a8c0@rpopescu |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-admin |
IMHO SGI's XFS is your best bet, as is has *very* good scalability on file
size and file count.
Also the .2 release removes a deadlock when the FS in under extreme (and i
mean extreme) usage.
> Jeff (or anyone else),
> Is there some kind of file system (for Linux) that will provide better
> performance than ext2? XFS or ReiserFS maybe?
> Thanks,
> Peter Darley
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jeff Self [mailto:jself(at)nngov(dot)com]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2002 8:22 AM
> To: Peter Darley
> Cc: Pgsql-Admin
> Subject: Re: [ADMIN] Journaling file systems
>
>
> Journaled file systems will typically slow down a database somewhat.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Ragnar Kjørstad | 2002-02-26 17:41:59 | Re: Journaling file systems |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2002-02-26 17:19:44 | Re: Journaling file systems |