Re: wxWindows_Scintilla_patch

From: "Hiroshi Saito" <saito(at)inetrt(dot)skcapi(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: <julian(dot)smart(at)btopenworld(dot)com>
Cc: "Andreas Pflug" <Andreas(dot)Pflug(at)web(dot)de>,"Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>,<pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Jean-Michel POURE" <jm(at)poure(dot)com>
Subject: Re: wxWindows_Scintilla_patch
Date: 2003-09-16 15:17:59
Message-ID: 006801c37c65$b6d3f0b0$1f324d80@w2k
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Lists: pgadmin-hackers

Dear Julian Smart.

Thank you. Jean-Michel
But, Andreas may have good thought besides.
this base is independent.
This modification is a change in a specification of the base (scintilla).
It worries me...
How should I do?

Hiroshi Saito

From: "Jean-Michel POURE" <jm(at)poure(dot)com>

> Le Mardi 16 Septembre 2003 16:30, vous avez écrit :
> > Hi Andreas.
> > This patch of wxWindows stc/Scintilla.
> > See this sample.
> >
> > This is strong request.
> > How do you think about the means of the best condition which I should take?
> > Regards,
> > Hiroshi Saito
> Maybe you should try contacting Julian Smart <julian(dot)smart(at)btopenworld(dot)com>,
> who has CVS access to wxWindows. Cheers, Jean-Michel

In response to


Browse pgadmin-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stefan Csomor 2003-09-16 15:33:25 Re: wxWindows_Scintilla_patch
Previous Message Jean-Michel POURE 2003-09-16 14:53:18 Re: wxWindows_Scintilla_patch