From: | "Hiroshi Saito" <saito(at)inetrt(dot)skcapi(dot)co(dot)jp> |
---|---|
To: | <julian(dot)smart(at)btopenworld(dot)com> |
Cc: | "Andreas Pflug" <Andreas(dot)Pflug(at)web(dot)de>, "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>, <pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Jean-Michel POURE" <jm(at)poure(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: wxWindows_Scintilla_patch |
Date: | 2003-09-16 15:17:59 |
Message-ID: | 006801c37c65$b6d3f0b0$1f324d80@w2k |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgadmin-hackers |
Dear Julian Smart.
Thank you. Jean-Michel
But, Andreas may have good thought besides.
http://www.scintilla.org
this base is independent.
This modification is a change in a specification of the base (scintilla).
It worries me...
How should I do?
Regards,
Hiroshi Saito
From: "Jean-Michel POURE" <jm(at)poure(dot)com>
> Le Mardi 16 Septembre 2003 16:30, vous avez écrit :
> > Hi Andreas.
> > This patch of wxWindows stc/Scintilla.
> > See this sample.
> > http://cre-ent.skcapi.co.jp/~saito/pgadmin3/wxwindows_scintilla.jpg
> > This is strong request.
> > How do you think about the means of the best condition which I should take?
> > Regards,
> > Hiroshi Saito
>
> Maybe you should try contacting Julian Smart <julian(dot)smart(at)btopenworld(dot)com>,
> who has CVS access to wxWindows. Cheers, Jean-Michel
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Stefan Csomor | 2003-09-16 15:33:25 | Re: wxWindows_Scintilla_patch |
Previous Message | Jean-Michel POURE | 2003-09-16 14:53:18 | Re: wxWindows_Scintilla_patch |