Re: Databases compared at zend.com

From: "Richard Huxton" <dev(at)archonet(dot)com>
To: <pgsql-general(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Doug McNaught" <doug(at)wireboard(dot)com>, "Michael" <mwaples(at)waples(dot)net>, <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Databases compared at zend.com
Date: 2001-06-02 22:32:32
Message-ID: 006801c0ebb4$a6ffda80$1001a8c0@archonet.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

From: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>

> > could someone please describe the actual process,
>
> Large objects are now stored in pg_largeobject. Each LO is broken into
> chunks of a couple K apiece, and each chunk becomes a row. (Chunking
> makes partial updates more efficient, since you don't have to rewrite
> the entire LO.) The LO operations aren't really special, they're just a
> convenient interface for insert/update/delete operations in this table.
>
> Before 7.1, it worked the same except that each LO had its own table.

Perhaps a clear note in the docs - I definitely had the (mis-)impression
that LO's were standard files referenced by PG. That could have been my
background though, since that's how I tend to deal with documents/images
anyway.

- Richard Huxton

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message pipothebit 2001-06-02 23:20:17 add java as procedural language
Previous Message Tom Janssens 2001-06-02 20:47:20 QUESTION: Automatically generating Primary keys !!!