| From: | "Michael Paesold" <mpaesold(at)gmx(dot)at> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Peter Eisentraut" <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, "Robert Treat" <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net> |
| Cc: | "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "Bruce Momjian" <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Pervasive PostgreSQL Announcement |
| Date: | 2005-01-11 15:21:26 |
| Message-ID: | 006501c4f7f1$3b27a750$ad01a8c0@zaphod |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 11. Januar 2005 13:42 schrieb Robert Treat:
>> Whose trademark would it infringe upon?
>
> The point is, they are claiming trademark on a name that was hitherto free
> for
> everyone to use.
I have to agree with Peter. They could use "postgres" like everyone else
does, but claiming a trademark even on "Pervasive Postgres" seems bad. Josh,
you said you are in contact with them. Could you find out what they think
about this issue?
Best Regards,
Michael Paesold
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Lance Obermeyer | 2005-01-11 15:31:27 | Re: Pervasive PostgreSQL Announcement |
| Previous Message | Simone Brunozzi | 2005-01-11 15:18:55 | what about PostgreSQL certification ? |