| From: | "David Hartwig" <daybee(at)bellatlantic(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | <robert(at)chalmers(dot)com(dot)au>, "psql-general" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Cc: | <byronn(at)insightdist(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: [GENERAL] RE: ODBC question on R+w and +r only. solved |
| Date: | 1999-01-21 18:25:22 |
| Message-ID: | 006101be456b$730b7320$c37dc497@daveh |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
----- Original Message -----
From: Robert Chalmers <robert(at)chalmers(dot)com(dot)au>
To: psql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Sent: Wednesday, January 20, 1999 8:51 PM
Subject: [GENERAL] RE: ODBC question on R+w and +r only. solved
>Hmmm. Just gave all permisions to user, and created a NEW table database in
>Access, and it imported the new permissions.
>
>It seems that Access imports the permissions, and then doesn't let you
chang
>them, even when they have been changed in the pgsql system.
>
>not a bad idea I usppose.
>
>Now to work out the correct permissions that the ODBC driver should run
under.
>I notice there is [x]Read Only field in the config... should it be on/offf
and
>what are the ramifications of that side of it?
>
The next build of the driver will be more permissive in its defaults.
These conservitive settings go back to the days when ODBC updates were a
flip of a coin.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David Giffin | 1999-01-21 19:54:14 | Re: [GENERAL] Multiple Postgres Instances |
| Previous Message | Dan Warren | 1999-01-21 16:48:22 | Newbie interface question |