Re: Request for qualified column names

From: "Reggie Burnett" <rykr(at)bellsouth(dot)net>
To: "'Peter Eisentraut'" <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, "'Bruce Momjian'" <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "'Tom Lane'" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "'Dave Cramer'" <dave(at)fastcrypt(dot)com>, "'PostgreSQL Hackers Mailing List'" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Request for qualified column names
Date: 2003-01-28 22:24:57
Message-ID: 006001c2c71c$1a0ce6a0$c600a8c0@endeavor
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Could someone point me to this standard? Is that the standard for SQL
syntax? I wasn't aware there was a standard for RDBMS functionality. I
always assumed the features provided by the RDBMS were up to the
implementers.

Reggie

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Peter Eisentraut [mailto:peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 3:59 PM
> To: Bruce Momjian
> Cc: Tom Lane; Reggie Burnett; 'Dave Cramer'; 'PostgreSQL Hackers
Mailing
> List'
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Request for qualified column names
>
> Bruce Momjian writes:
>
> > My idea on this after chat with Dave was to add a GUC option that
puts
> > the schema.table.column name as the default column label, rather
than
> > just the column name.
>
> Can someone explain why this is needed at all? There is a reason why
the
> SQL standard does not provide for this information: it's not well
defined.
> Are you trying to make up a poor substitute for updatable views?
>
> --
> Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Steve Crawford 2003-01-28 23:26:01 Re: Cannot connect to the database (PG 7.3)
Previous Message Reggie Burnett 2003-01-28 22:23:23 Re: Request for qualified column names