Re: Optimizer & boolean syntax

From: "Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
To: "Alvaro Herrera" <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl>
Cc: "Stephan Szabo" <sszabo(at)megazone23(dot)bigpanda(dot)com>, "Daniele Orlandi" <daniele(at)orlandi(dot)com>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Optimizer & boolean syntax
Date: 2002-11-21 23:01:10
Message-ID: 005f01c291b1$e21ceaa0$6600a8c0@internal
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> > Not that I see the point of indexing booleans, but hey :)
>
> If one of the values is much more infrequent than the other, you can
> probably get a substantial win using a partial index, can't you?

Yes, I thought of the partial index after I wrote that email :)

Chris

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message scott.marlowe 2002-11-21 23:01:28 Re: Optimizer & boolean syntax
Previous Message scott.marlowe 2002-11-21 22:59:39 Re: Optimizer & boolean syntax