Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution?

From: "Greg Sabino Mullane" <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution?
Date: 2008-07-23 15:46:58
Message-ID: 0057334c721cf5d3253dc2f7ed354abb@biglumber.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: RIPEMD160

> Do you want Tom to
> a) spend a month improving the optimizer
> b) get him to review already working code so we can package things

Actually, if the alternative is having the pieces outside of core where
Tom never sees them, I'd vote for (b), as the optimizer already kicks ass
but having Tom review other code is pretty invaluable.

Code outside of core, is, in reality, less reviewed, less likely to work
well with recent PG versions, and more likely to cause problems. It's also
less likely to be found by people, less likely to be used by people, and
less likely to be included by distros. Not to say that everything should get
shoved into core, of course, but there are strong arguments for both sides.

- --
Greg Sabino Mullane greg(at)turnstep(dot)com
PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 200807231145
http://biglumber.com/x/web?pk=2529DF6AB8F79407E94445B4BC9B906714964AC8

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iEYEAREDAAYFAkiHUlgACgkQvJuQZxSWSshURACg2MIfdH0cJOTf75HmuGEzlxo6
OBQAn21sqZ+rBEel1cf2dAIYpoWPHwW5
=Pj7J
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kenneth Marshall 2008-07-23 15:56:03 Re: [PATCH]-hash index improving
Previous Message Tom Lane 2008-07-23 15:43:50 Re: pltcl_*mod commands are broken on Solaris 10