Re: Subject: Re: [GENERAL] A book for PgSQL? A need? yes? no?

Just to let you know, I have two books in the pipeline now.
The first is in the nature of a "Guide", to learn the PgSQL version of sql,
and how to use it, from a non-technical pint of view. Basic administration,
creating, modifying, updating, relationships, odbc+access.
A book for the learning and end-user environment. In progress now. In the
Addison Wesley/T. Nelson style. Couple of months to get to print.

The second is the O'Reilly standard. In planning stage. Indepth - technical.
If you have seen "Sendmail" by O'Reilly, you know what I mean. Much longer
to get to print. Big project.

Bob
----- Original Message -----
From: Stephan Doliov <statsol(at)statsol(dot)com>
To: <pgsql-general(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Sent: Sunday, February 14, 1999 3:33 AM
Subject: Re: Subject: Re: [GENERAL] A book for PgSQL? A need? yes? no?

>On Fri, 12 Feb 1999, Rudy Gireyev wrote:
>
>> So if I'm reading this correctly, the book idea is dead. Right?
>
>hardly. i think gene was being a little bit playful and i tried to point
>out, as others have, the substantial point, which was acquiring mindshare
>through the presence of an O'Reilly book. I think it's worth doing,
>especially if it is well planned and a first release would coincide with a
>release of postgres that has the few features/standards it is presently
>missing -- sort of an postgres has truly arrived party (much the way linux
>has gained mindshare credibility among non hacker types in the past 18
>months).
>
>steve
>
>
>