| From: | "Vadim Mikheev" <vmikheev(at)sectorbase(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Adam Haberlach" <adam(at)newsnipple(dot)com>, "Don Baccus" <dhogaza(at)pacifier(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "Thomas Lockhart" <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>, "PostgreSQL Development" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: beta testing version |
| Date: | 2000-12-03 07:00:29 |
| Message-ID: | 005001c05cf6$b94fd160$b57a30d0@sectorbase.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> There is risk here. It isn't so much in the fact that PostgreSQL, Inc
> is doing a couple of modest closed-source things with the code. After
> all, the PG community has long acknowleged that the BSD license would
> allow others to co-op the code and commercialize it with no obligations.
>
> It is rather sad to see PG, Inc. take the first step in this direction.
>
> How long until the entire code base gets co-opted?
I totaly missed your point here. How closing source of ERserver is related
to closing code of PostgreSQL DB server? Let me clear things:
1. ERserver isn't based on WAL. It will work with any version >= 6.5
2. WAL was partially sponsored by my employer, Sectorbase.com,
not by PG, Inc.
Vadim
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Billy G. Allie | 2000-12-03 07:25:26 | Re: compiling pg 7.0.3 on sco 5.0.5 |
| Previous Message | Don Baccus | 2000-12-03 06:21:18 | Re: beta testing version |