From: | Daniel Åkerud <zilch(at)home(dot)se> |
---|---|
To: | "PostgreSQL-general" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Foreign Keys Constraints, perforamance analysis |
Date: | 2001-06-23 21:45:20 |
Message-ID: | 004d01c0fc2d$cd03a570$c901a8c0@automatic100 |
Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
> =?iso-8859-1?Q?Daniel_=C5kerud?= <zilch(at)home(dot)se> writes:
> >> ... Not surprising that it's much slower. The real
> >> question is what this scenario has to do with production activities.
>
> > It has nothing to do with production activities. I just want to know
how,
> > and how much, Foreign Keys Constraints affect performance.
>
> My point is that unless bulk delete is an operation you do a lot,
> this measurement has little to do with everyday performance. A more
> reasonable test (I think) would be to time deletion of a *single* person
> record --- and the associated implicit deletion of a small number of
> dependent records --- against deletion of the same person record and
> explicit deletion of the same number of dependent records. That
> actually has something to do with performance of real-world applications
> that delete individual records. As is, you are measuring (in effect)
> DELETE FROM married;
> against
> FOR akey IN (SELECT key FROM married) DO
> DELETE FROM married WHERE key = akey;
> and then blaming the speed difference on foreign keys. It's got nothing
> to do with foreign keys and everything to do with number of queries
> issued.
No,
I compare
DELETE FROM person;
against
DELETE FROM person;
DELETE FROM married;
DELETE FROM child;
Which I think has very much to do with performane of real-worl applications
i think. I often think of Accounts, where there are numerous records stored
for this account - which should be deleted when the account is deleted.
> regards, tom lane
Daniel Åkerud
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tim Barnard | 2001-06-23 21:50:58 | ANSI SQL-92 Standard, for download? |
Previous Message | Daniel Åkerud | 2001-06-23 21:42:00 | Re: ANSI SQL-92 Standard, for download? |