Re: pg_dump/PgAdmin problem?

From: "Gregory Wood" <gregw(at)com-stock(dot)com>
To: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "PostgreSQL-General" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_dump/PgAdmin problem?
Date: 2002-01-29 22:14:57
Message-ID: 004901c1a912$6645f210$7889ffcc@comstock.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

As far as I can tell, those views only reference system tables (pg_class,
pg_attribute, pg_type,pg_rewrite). But if you still need it I'll be happy to
send it to you directly.

Greg

----- Original Message -----
From: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Gregory Wood" <gregw(at)com-stock(dot)com>
Cc: "PostgreSQL-General" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2002 4:40 PM
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] pg_dump/PgAdmin problem?

> "Gregory Wood" <gregw(at)com-stock(dot)com> writes:
> > I've tracked down the problem and it seems it doesn't like two view
> > definitions (pgadmin_sequences and pgadmin_tables), and therefore the
> > subsequent GRANTs. The views are at the end of the email.
>
> The views are difficult to do much with when we can't run them through
> the software ... which we can't do without the context of the underlying
> table definitions. Could you provide the complete schema dump
> (pg_dump -s)?
>
> regards, tom lane
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
> subscribe-nomail command to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org so that your
> message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stephan Szabo 2002-01-29 22:29:25 Re: pg_dump/PgAdmin problem?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2002-01-29 22:11:50 Re: pg_dump/PgAdmin problem?