From: | "David Bennett" <davidb(at)pfxcorp(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: How do BEGIN/COMMIT/ABORT operate in a nested SPI query? |
Date: | 2016-04-18 23:59:34 |
Message-ID: | 004301d199ce$5b586f10$12094d30$@pfxcorp.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
> From: Albe Laurenz [mailto:laurenz(dot)albe(at)wien(dot)gv(dot)at]
>
> > I am attempting to create a new language implementation. The language
> > is Andl (andl.org) so the handler is plandl.
> > This is a question about executing SPI queries from inside plandl.
> >
> > The documentation makes it clear that SPI allows nested queries; that
> > in some instances it will be necessary to call SPI_push() and
> > SPI_pop(), but in others this will be handled automatically. Se
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.5/interactive/spi-spi-push.html.
> >
> > It is an important design feature of plandl to allow nested queries.
> >
> > My question is: where are the transaction boundaries if the
> > inner/outer query do or do not contain BEGIN/ABORT/COMMIT? Do they
> > nest, or does an inner COMMIT finish a transaction started by an outer
> BEGIN, or is it ignored?
>
> You cannot have BEGIN or COMMIT inside a function.
Are you sure you meant it like that? I already have BEGIN/COMMIT inside a function and it works perfectly. If it did not, then it would be impossible to use BEGIN/COMMIT in any language handler, since every call to a language handler is a call to a function.
Did you mean 'inside a nested function'? Or something else?
Regards
David M Bennett FACS
Andl - A New Database Language - andl.org
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | david | 2016-04-19 00:41:15 | Re: How do BEGIN/COMMIT/ABORT operate in a nested SPI query? |
Previous Message | Thomas Kellerer | 2016-04-18 15:53:59 | Re: what's the exact command definition in read committed isolation level? |