Re: Linux Distributions

From: "mike sears" <matrix(at)quadrent(dot)net>
To: "Andy Ruhl" <acruhl(at)sdf(dot)lonestar(dot)org>, "Peter Darley" <pdarley(at)kinesis-cem(dot)com>
Cc: "Pgsql-Admin" <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Linux Distributions
Date: 2002-03-06 21:25:52
Message-ID: 004201c1c555$7e871ac0$fa00000a@wyd2002.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin

iirc redhat has been busy optimizing postgresql, but if you take the time
and sit down, and configure postgres, you can prolly make it just as speedy
on any distro.

just my .02

Matrix

----- Original Message -----
From: "Andy Ruhl" <acruhl(at)sdf(dot)lonestar(dot)org>
To: "Peter Darley" <pdarley(at)kinesis-cem(dot)com>
Cc: "Pgsql-Admin" <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 4:01 PM
Subject: Re: Linux Distributions

> On Wed, 6 Mar 2002, Peter Darley wrote:
>
> > Andy,
> > I've got nothing against FreeBSD, except that I'm familiar with Linux
and
> > not with BSD. What is it about FreeBSD that is going to make it faster
than
> > Linux? Any idea where I can find some comparative benchmarks?
> > Thanks,
> > Peter Darley
>
> I don't mean to start a flame war here...
>
> Actually, I've seen benchmarks (but don't remember where they are) that
> show that Linux and FreeBSD are amazingly equal at most activities on
> equivalent hardware.
>
> My point is, machines are faster when they are actually running.
>
> Andy
>
> --
> acruhl(at)sdf(dot)lonestar(dot)org
> SDF Public Access UNIX System - http://sdf.lonestar.org
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
> subscribe-nomail command to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org so that your
> message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Gilbert 2002-03-06 21:54:56 Re: Linux Distributions
Previous Message Joel Mc Graw 2002-03-06 21:19:29 Large table or many small tables?