| From: | "Arthur(at)LinkLine(dot)com" <arthur(at)linkline(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "PostGreSQL Hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | mV database tools |
| Date: | 2002-05-02 07:05:20 |
| Message-ID: | 004001c1f1a7$b94abd00$8cd61e40@Arthur |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Dear Team,
I've read your comments. No, I don't think that MVD's are the best thing since sliced bread....but they do have a certain "simplicity" that seems to hold the key to high speed analysis of large volumes of streaming data from the "eyes" of a robot. This stream of data must be quickly analyzed and subdivided into recognizable objects...I realize this area is wide open to debate...however....an MVD might at least offer a "useful" theoretical "angle" in a "pre-PostGreSQL" stage of processing...just a thought...
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Hannu Krosing | 2002-05-02 07:25:03 | Re: Schemas: status report, call for developers |
| Previous Message | Hiroshi Inoue | 2002-05-02 05:48:00 | Re: Using views and MS access via odbc |