Re: Article on MySQL vs. Postgres

From: "Randall Parker" <randall(at)nls(dot)net>
To: "pgsql-hackers(at)hub(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)hub(dot)org>, "Tim Perdue" <tperdue(at)valinux(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Article on MySQL vs. Postgres
Date: 2000-07-11 00:39:12
Message-ID: 00370074338047@mail.nls.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tim,

Aside: Is your MySQL database running on an ext2 volume or on a ReiserFS volume? I read somewhere that half of SourceForge is now running in Reiser. Is this true?

On Wed, 05 Jul 2000 10:00:39 -0700, Tim Perdue wrote:

>The Hermit Hacker wrote:
>>
>> Will you accept modifications to this if submit'd, to make better use of
>> features that PostgreSQL has to improve performance? Just downloaded it
>> and am going to look her through, just wondering if it would be a waste of
>> time for me to suggest changes though :)
>
>If you can figure out an algorithm that shows these nested messages more
>efficiently on postgres, then that would be a pretty compelling reason
>to move SourceForge to Postgres instead of MySQL, which is totally
>reaching its limits on our site. Right now, neither database appears
>like it will work, so Oracle is starting to loom on the horizon.
>
>Tim
>
>--
>Founder - PHPBuilder.com / Geocrawler.com
>Lead Developer - SourceForge
>VA Linux Systems
>408-542-5723

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Chris Bitmead 2000-07-11 00:53:04 Re: postgres fe/be protocol
Previous Message Chris Bitmead 2000-07-11 00:38:39 postgres 7.2 features.