Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Dry Run Mode, + W9X

From: "Serguei Mokhov" <mokhov(at)cs(dot)concordia(dot)ca>
To: "Andreas Pflug" <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de>
Cc: "pgadmin-hackers" <pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Dry Run Mode, + W9X
Date: 2004-09-19 20:33:25
Message-ID: 003001c49e87$ee0fc140$0301a8c0@gunnymede.lan (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgadmin-hackers
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Andreas Pflug" <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de>
Sent: September 19, 2004 2:17 PM

> > Nonetheless, Dave Page built 9X binaries for 1.0.2, which work perfectly okay
> > for me. Another reason is the registry usage, but as I said, I want to
> > avoid the use of registry in the dry run mode altogether.
> Our project doesn't contain non-unicode support any more.

Oops. I guess that passed by me unnoticed. :(

> > So, if I address the caveats and other issues that come up and
> > if the change is not too invasive, I have some chances for the
> > work to be applied when I contribute it?
> Yes, but not before 1.2 release (which will not take too much time)

Of course not as I said in my original post. And the feature freeze
is taking place.

> It will be hard work:
> - many comboboxes are filled from db, you might even force uncatched 
> errors here.
> - some (few) strings are exchanged at runtime. First that comes to my 
> mind is "Users/Groups" on the privileges tab, selectable by "display 
> users in privileges". You could scan for CTRL_STATIC in the sources.

It's okay. Life is not easy either. Thanks for the pointers!

> Regards,
> Andreas


In response to

pgadmin-hackers by date

Next:From: Serguei MokhovDate: 2004-09-19 21:42:40
Subject: Unicode support on W9x
Previous:From: Serguei MokhovDate: 2004-09-19 20:27:54
Subject: Necessity of wxstd.po

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group