----- Original Message -----
From: "Andreas Pflug" <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de>
Sent: September 19, 2004 2:17 PM
> > Nonetheless, Dave Page built 9X binaries for 1.0.2, which work perfectly okay
> > for me. Another reason is the registry usage, but as I said, I want to
> > avoid the use of registry in the dry run mode altogether.
> Our project doesn't contain non-unicode support any more.
Oops. I guess that passed by me unnoticed. :(
> > So, if I address the caveats and other issues that come up and
> > if the change is not too invasive, I have some chances for the
> > work to be applied when I contribute it?
> Yes, but not before 1.2 release (which will not take too much time)
Of course not as I said in my original post. And the feature freeze
is taking place.
> It will be hard work:
> - many comboboxes are filled from db, you might even force uncatched
> errors here.
> - some (few) strings are exchanged at runtime. First that comes to my
> mind is "Users/Groups" on the privileges tab, selectable by "display
> users in privileges". You could scan for CTRL_STATIC in the sources.
It's okay. Life is not easy either. Thanks for the pointers!
In response to
pgadmin-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Serguei Mokhov||Date: 2004-09-19 21:42:40|
|Subject: Unicode support on W9x|
|Previous:||From: Serguei Mokhov||Date: 2004-09-19 20:27:54|
|Subject: Necessity of wxstd.po|