Re: Extension disappearing act

From: Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com>
To: Dominique Devienne <ddevienne(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Extension disappearing act
Date: 2025-06-19 14:18:39
Message-ID: 002c519f-fb22-4ec0-b3e3-719f1d54035e@aklaver.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On 6/19/25 06:09, Dominique Devienne wrote:
> Hi. Little mystery we don't understand. v17.
>
> Create new DB, owned by dedicated new ROLE.
> Create extension (pgcrypto) in our case. Installed in public, owned by
> DB owner role.
> Create schemas and populate them inside the DB.
> This also creates roles associated to those schemas.
> One of the schema is owned by the DB owner (in case that matters).
> Creates functions using pgcrypto, in some of those schemas.
> Drop all schemas (and associated roles), thus pgcrypto-using functins are gone.

Does 'all' include the public schema?

> Of course, the DB owner role was not dropped. Can't in fact.
> Somehow, the pgcrypto extension has disappeared, as side-effects of the drops.

Was it in fact installed in the public schema?

> TIA, --DD
>
>

--
Adrian Klaver
adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dominique Devienne 2025-06-19 14:54:03 Re: Extension disappearing act
Previous Message Tomas Vondra 2025-06-19 14:13:48 Re: Extension disappearing act