Re: Lonely Patch Seeks Long-Term Commitment to Codebase

From: "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Lonely Patch Seeks Long-Term Commitment to Codebase
Date: 2003-05-28 20:50:24
Message-ID: 002b01c3255a$db225310$6401a8c0@DUNSLANE
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

I think he said he was going to take a break of about a week to catch up on
patches, so I was waiting till that time was over before making a similar
query. I haven't seen a lot of "Thankyou, this patch has been applied"
messages, though.

cheers

andrew

----- Original Message -----
From: "Matthew T. O'Connor" <matthew(at)zeut(dot)net>
To: "Ben Lamb" <pgsql-patches(at)zurgy(dot)org>; <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2003 4:30 PM
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Lonely Patch Seeks Long-Term Commitment to Codebase

> I think Bruce is still working through his backlog of patches. I know I'm
> waiting for my pg_autovacuum patch to be applied which was submitted on
May
> 7th.
>
> Just give him some time, he's been working hard on the win32 port, a
worthy
> and difficult task IMHO.
>
> Matthew
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Ben Lamb" <pgsql-patches(at)zurgy(dot)org>
> To: <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
> Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2003 3:26 PM
> Subject: [PATCHES] Lonely Patch Seeks Long-Term Commitment to Codebase
>
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I sent a patch to this list earlier this month to improve the speed of
> > PGunescapeBytea(). IMHO it is handicapped as it can take over a minute
> > to process a large amount of data, e.g. a 500Kb JPEG.
> >
> > The attached patch replaces the sscanf function that causes the delay,
> > the code was borrowed from the PostgreSQL Python interface with
> > permission from the author.
> >
> > Please could I have some feedback on whether the patch is likely to be
> > committed? Has it been rejected? Is it stuck on someone's TODO list? Was
> > the code unsuitable? Have I neglected some procedure, etc?
> >
> > Best regards,
> >
> > Ben Lamb.
> >
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
> ----
>
>
> > --- fe-exec.c Thu May 8 11:49:34 2003
> > +++ fe-exec.c.latest Thu May 8 11:45:17 2003
> > @@ -180,6 +180,8 @@
> > return result;
> > }
> >
> > +#define VAL(CH) ((CH) - '0')
> > +
> > /*
> > * PQunescapeBytea - converts the null terminated string representation
> > * of a bytea, strtext, into binary, filling a buffer. It returns a
> > @@ -187,101 +189,66 @@
> > * buffer in retbuflen. The pointer may subsequently be used as an
> > * argument to the function free(3). It is the reverse of
PQescapeBytea.
> > *
> > - * The following transformations are reversed:
> > - * '\0' == ASCII 0 == \000
> > - * '\'' == ASCII 39 == \'
> > - * '\\' == ASCII 92 == \\
> > + * The following transformations are made:
> > + * \' == ASCII 39 == '
> > + * \\ == ASCII 92 == \
> > + * \ooo == a byte whose value = ooo (ooo is an octal number)
> > + * \x == x (x is any character not matched by the above
> transformations)
> > *
> > - * States:
> > - * 0 normal 0->1->2->3->4
> > - * 1 \ 1->5
> > - * 2 \0 1->6
> > - * 3 \00
> > - * 4 \000
> > - * 5 \'
> > - * 6 \\
> > */
> > unsigned char *
> > PQunescapeBytea(unsigned char *strtext, size_t *retbuflen)
> > {
> > - size_t buflen;
> > - unsigned char *buffer,
> > - *sp,
> > - *bp;
> > - unsigned int state = 0;
> > + size_t strtextlen, buflen;
> > + unsigned char *buffer, *tmpbuf;
> > + int i, j, byte;
> >
> > - if (strtext == NULL)
> > + if (strtext == NULL) {
> > return NULL;
> > - buflen = strlen(strtext); /* will shrink, also we discover if
> > - * strtext */
> > - buffer = (unsigned char *) malloc(buflen); /* isn't NULL terminated */
> > + }
> > +
> > + strtextlen = strlen(strtext); /* will shrink, also we discover if
> > + * strtext isn't NULL terminated */
> > + buffer = (unsigned char *)malloc(strtextlen);
> > if (buffer == NULL)
> > return NULL;
> > - for (bp = buffer, sp = strtext; *sp != '\0'; bp++, sp++)
> > +
> > + for (i = j = buflen = 0; i < strtextlen;)
> > {
> > - switch (state)
> > + switch (strtext[i])
> > {
> > - case 0:
> > - if (*sp == '\\')
> > - state = 1;
> > - *bp = *sp;
> > - break;
> > - case 1:
> > - if (*sp == '\'') /* state=5 */
> > - { /* replace \' with 39 */
> > - bp--;
> > - *bp = '\'';
> > - buflen--;
> > - state = 0;
> > - }
> > - else if (*sp == '\\') /* state=6 */
> > - { /* replace \\ with 92 */
> > - bp--;
> > - *bp = '\\';
> > - buflen--;
> > - state = 0;
> > - }
> > + case '\\':
> > + i++;
> > + if (strtext[i] == '\\')
> > + buffer[j++] = strtext[i++];
> > else
> > {
> > - if (isdigit(*sp))
> > - state = 2;
> > - else
> > - state = 0;
> > - *bp = *sp;
> > + if ((isdigit(strtext[i])) &&
> > + (isdigit(strtext[i+1])) &&
> > + (isdigit(strtext[i+2])))
> > + {
> > + byte = VAL(strtext[i++]);
> > + byte = (byte << 3) + VAL(strtext[i++]);
> > + buffer[j++] = (byte << 3) + VAL(strtext[i++]);
> > + }
> > }
> > break;
> > - case 2:
> > - if (isdigit(*sp))
> > - state = 3;
> > - else
> > - state = 0;
> > - *bp = *sp;
> > - break;
> > - case 3:
> > - if (isdigit(*sp)) /* state=4 */
> > - {
> > - int v;
> >
> > - bp -= 3;
> > - sscanf(sp - 2, "%03o", &v);
> > - *bp = v;
> > - buflen -= 3;
> > - state = 0;
> > - }
> > - else
> > - {
> > - *bp = *sp;
> > - state = 0;
> > - }
> > - break;
> > + default:
> > + buffer[j++] = strtext[i++];
> > }
> > }
> > - buffer = realloc(buffer, buflen);
> > - if (buffer == NULL)
> > - return NULL;
> > + buflen = j; /* buflen is the length of the unquoted data */
> > + tmpbuf = realloc(buffer, buflen);
> > +
> > + if (!tmpbuf)
> > + {
> > + free(buffer);
> > + return 0;
> > + }
> >
> > *retbuflen = buflen;
> > - return buffer;
> > + return tmpbuf;
> > }
> >
> > /* ----------------
> >
> >
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
> ----
>
>
> >
> > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> > TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
> > (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> >
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
> (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org)

In response to

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ben Lamb 2003-05-28 21:03:31 Re: Lonely Patch Seeks Long-Term Commitment to Codebase
Previous Message Matthew T. O'Connor 2003-05-28 20:30:39 Re: Lonely Patch Seeks Long-Term Commitment to Codebase