From: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila(at)huawei(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | barry_bell(at)harte-hanks(dot)com |
Cc: | pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: BUG #6534: Passing numeric Bind variables to ODBC driver convers to "Double precision" |
Date: | 2012-04-10 00:48:47 |
Message-ID: | 002701cd16b3$b0d860a0$128921e0$%kapila@huawei.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
In ODBC while binding variable using SQLBindParameter(..) API you might be
using SQL_DOUBLE or SQL_Numeric or some similar datatype to send the
variable, thats why in postgres it is showing as "Double precision"
-----Original Message-----
From: pgsql-bugs-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
[mailto:pgsql-bugs-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org] On Behalf Of Robert Haas
Sent: Monday, April 09, 2012 7:31 PM
To: barry_bell(at)harte-hanks(dot)com
Cc: pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [BUGS] BUG #6534: Passing numeric Bind variables to ODBC driver
convers to "Double precision"
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 3:04 PM, <barry_bell(at)harte-hanks(dot)com> wrote:
> The following bug has been logged on the website:
>
> Bug reference: 6534
> Logged by: Barry Bell
> Email address: barry_bell(at)harte-hanks(dot)com
> PostgreSQL version: 9.1.2
> Operating system: Windows Server 2003
> Description:
>
> Using the lastest of ODBC ANSI driver for
> windows 32bit ver 9.00.03
> Calling from MS VFP 9.0
>
> public nvar as interger
> nvar=1
> running the following sql:
> "( select function_pkg(?nvar) "
>
> The bind variable nvar will show in postgres as "Double Precision" format
> instead of integer.
>
> Is there a setting on the ODBC driver for incoming vairables?
> If not it is a buf.
Given the lack of any response here, I suggest reposting this to the
pgsql-odbc mailing list.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2012-04-10 00:51:55 | Re: BUG #6565: GEQO documentation discrepancy after 9.0 change? |
Previous Message | Kevin Grittner | 2012-04-09 19:07:43 | Re: BUG #6528: pglesslog still referenced in docs, but no 9.1 support |