unsuscribe mailing list

From: ingrim <ingridm(at)qoslabs(dot)com>
To: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: unsuscribe mailing list
Date: 2003-10-13 14:38:25
Message-ID: 002601c39197$ac832170$7d64a8c0@ingridma
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-performance

-----Original Message-----
From: pgsql-performance-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
[mailto:pgsql-performance-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org] On Behalf Of Vivek Khera
Sent: Viernes, 10 de Octubre de 2003 03:14 p.m.
To: Josh Berkus
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [PERFORM] go for a script! / ex: PostgreSQL vs. MySQL

>>>>> "JB" == Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> writes:

JB> Vivek,
NB> shared_buffers = 1/16th of total memory
NB> effective_cache_size = 80% of the supposed kernel cache.
>>
>> Please take into account the blocksize compiled into PG, too...

JB> We can;t change the blocksize in a script that only does the .conf
JB> file. Or are you suggesting something else?

when you compute optimal shared buffers and effective cache size,
these are in terms of blocksize. so if I have 16k block size, you
can't compute based on default 8k blocksize. at worst, it would have
to be a parameter you pass to the tuning script.

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space map settings

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2003-10-13 14:38:30 Re: libreadline.so.4 problems on solaris
Previous Message Harry Broomhall 2003-10-13 14:21:46 Re: Performance weirdness with/without vacuum analyze

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joe Conway 2003-10-13 15:04:27 Re: Another weird one with an UPDATE
Previous Message Shridhar Daithankar 2003-10-13 14:14:55 Re: go for a script! / ex: PostgreSQL vs. MySQL