Re: Postgres is too slow?

From: "Richard Huxton" <dev(at)archonet(dot)com>
To: "Richard Huxton" <dev(at)archonet(dot)com>, "Paul Mamin" <magamos(at)mail(dot)ru>
Cc: <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Postgres is too slow?
Date: 2001-06-22 11:26:15
Message-ID: 002601c0fb0e$2cbef580$1001a8c0@archonet.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

From: "Richard Huxton" <dev(at)archonet(dot)com>

> Paul Mamin wrote:
> >
> > The SQL command I need to request:
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------
> > select numberid, sum(TarifDurationAir-CallDuration)/count(*)
> > from callbase
> > group by numberid;
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------

Made up some test data (3491 values of numberid, 140 entries for each).
Timings I'm getting on an old AMD-K6ii - 400Mhz w/256 MB (and a lot of
quiescent apps)

For your query: 54secs

By setting sort_mem to 8192 (8MB) I get a time of 49s but at the cost of a
much larger backend process.

Just doing:

SELECT numberid FROM callbase GROUP BY numberid;

Gives a timing of 34secs.

Disk activity is minimal - CPU is maxed out in user processing. I'd expect
your setup to be 10% faster at least.

HTH

- Richard Huxton

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Yasuo Ohgaki 2001-06-22 11:33:11 Re: Re[2]: Postgres is too slow?
Previous Message Yasuo Ohgaki 2001-06-22 11:04:57 Re: Re[2]: Postgres is too slow?