> > OK, here's a situation. One of the programmers at your company runs
the
> > disk out of space. You're going to go bonk him on the head, but first,
> > there are more pressing matters. PostgreSQL 6.5 has horked up the
tables,
> > and needs to be fixed. 7.0 is released, which has a fix for the
problem.
>
> Not a good example, but I understand your comparison.
Why not? It's a situation that came up a couple of times on this list
right around the 7.0 release...
> The relevance is that most who use it don't really care where the stuff
> is. They just want to upgrade.
Well, without meaning to be rude, that seems to be an attitude that would
come from Redmond. : )
steve