From: | "Regina Obe" <lr(at)pcorp(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | "'Joshua D(dot) Drake'" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, "'Tom Lane'" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | "'Brian Dunavant'" <brian(at)omniti(dot)com>, "'Psql_General \(E-mail\)'" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: WIP: CoC V2 |
Date: | 2016-01-12 08:02:16 |
Message-ID: | 001c01d14d0f$8dc15180$a943f480$@pcorp.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Josh,
> tl;dr;
> * Modified #2 to be less harsh.
> * Modified #3 with TGL and James comments
> * Did not remove examples as I believe they are vital to the success
> I saw Regina's post, I believe it is good for context but I also believe that something concise and to the point is the better path.
> PostgreSQL Global Development Group (PGDG) Code of Conduct (CoC):
> 1. The CoC is to provide community guidelines for creating and enforcing a safe, respectful, productive, and collaborative place for any person who is willing to contribute in a safe, respectful, productive and collaborative way.
I don't know what your idea is of being "respectful and collaborative", but if dismissing my Coc because it's longer than your Coc and not even asking for comments is your idea of collaboration, then I think we have a big problem.
Your repeat of terms in the beginning and the end looks really weird too.
Thanks,
Regina
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Chris Travers | 2016-01-12 08:05:21 | Re: Code of Conduct: Is it time? |
Previous Message | Albe Laurenz | 2016-01-12 07:57:08 | Re: Code of Conduct: Is it time? |