R: I: Help with indexes/queries/msaccess

From: "Fabrizio Mazzoni" <fabrizio(at)macron(dot)com>
To: <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: R: I: Help with indexes/queries/msaccess
Date: 2001-06-29 14:59:05
Message-ID: 001c01c100ac$0ce391a0$4f00a8c0@fabrizio
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Yes..all the fields i use in my query are indexed. And before executing the
query i vaccumed the db to be sure...anyway..as you said i must try the
other type of syntax..

Thanks anyway!

fabrizio(at)macrongolf(dot)com
http://macrongolf.com
http://eteampoint.com
http://macron.com

-----Messaggio originale-----
Da: wsheldah(at)lexmark(dot)com [mailto:wsheldah(at)lexmark(dot)com]
Inviato: venerdì 29 giugno 2001 16:50
A: Fabrizio Mazzoni
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Oggetto: Re: [GENERAL] I: Help with indexes/queries/msaccess

When you use the join syntax you did, you're explicitly telling postgres in
what
order to join the tables. If you use the "classic" syntax as you described
it,
postgres will do its best to figure out the best join order. It probably
couldn't hurt to try.

When you say you created all the necessary indices, do you mean that all the
fields used in the join criteria are indexed?

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2001-06-29 15:02:50 Evaluating Subselects
Previous Message Tom Lane 2001-06-29 14:53:42 Re: function cache??