Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: beta testing version

From: "xuyifeng" <jamexu(at)telekbird(dot)com(dot)cn>
To: <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Don Baccus" <dhogaza(at)pacifier(dot)com>
Subject: Re: beta testing version
Date: 2000-11-28 15:15:23
Message-ID: 001901c0594e$0ae254a0$e001a8c0@xyf (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
no doubt,  I have touched some problems PG has, right?  if PG is so good,  
is there any necessary for the team  to improve PG again?


----- Original Message ----- 
From: Don Baccus <dhogaza(at)pacifier(dot)com>
To: xuyifeng <jamexu(at)telekbird(dot)com(dot)cn>; <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2000 10:37 PM
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] beta testing version

> At 04:17 PM 11/28/00 +0800, xuyifeng wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >   how long is PG7.1 already in beta testing? can it be released before Christmas day?
> >   can PG7.1  will recover database from system crash?
> This guy's a troll from the PHP Builder's site (at least, Tim Perdue and I suspect this
> due to some posts he made in regard to Tim's SourceForge/Postgres article).
> Since he's read Tim's article, and at least some of the follow-up posts (given that
> he's posted responses himself), he should know by now that PG 7.1 is still in a pre-beta
> state and won't be released before Christmas day.  I also posted a fairly long answer
> to a question Tim's posted at regarding recoverability and this guy's
> undoubtably read it, too.
> Have I forgotten anything, xuyifeng?
> - Don Baccus, Portland OR <dhogaza(at)pacifier(dot)com>
>   Nature photos, on-line guides, Pacific Northwest
>   Rare Bird Alert Service and other goodies at

In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Don BaccusDate: 2000-11-28 15:16:33
Subject: Re: beta testing version
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2000-11-28 15:09:57
Subject: Re: is it a bug?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group