From: | "Sander Steffann" <steffann(at)nederland(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | "Lamar Owen" <lowen(at)pari(dot)edu>, "Gaetano Mendola" <mendola(at)bigfoot(dot)com>, <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: RPM RH9.0 conflict with unixODBC |
Date: | 2003-11-25 20:12:56 |
Message-ID: | 001201c3b390$84949b60$64c8a8c0@10ww.steffann.nl |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Hi,
> > this are the rpm for 9.0:
> > 3768418 Nov 24 10:07 postgresql-7.4-0.3PGDG.i386.rpm
>
> > and this for rhas-2.1:
> > 2080872 Nov 24 10:08 postgresql-7.4-0.3PGDG.i386.rpm
>
> > how you can see the sizes are completely different.
> > Am I missing something ?
>
> Compiler version and flags. Although that is a substantial difference.
The
> rhas-2.1 compiler is the Red Hat gcc 2.96, and the RH9 compiler is gcc 3.
> Apparently gcc 3 generates large code. Sander, can you verify this, since
> you built both of these?
The file sizes are correct. I can't explain the huge difference though...
They both contain the same files, and are built from the same specfile. The
only difference between the build commands is that the RedHat 9 RPMs are
built with --define 'build89 1', and the RHEL RPMs are built with --define
'build7x 1' and --define 'plperl 0'. The exclusion of plperl shouldn't make
a difference in this RPM, only in the postgresql-pl RPM...
In short: both filesizes are correct, and I can't explain it :(
Sander.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jason Tesser | 2003-11-25 20:29:05 | Re: pam authentication for postgres |
Previous Message | Jonathan Bartlett | 2003-11-25 20:02:10 | Re: inheritance help |