Re: Bytea string operator support

From: "Joe Conway" <joseph(dot)conway(at)home(dot)com>
To: "Bruce Momjian" <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Peter Eisentraut" <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Bytea string operator support
Date: 2001-09-13 17:16:54
Message-ID: 001201c13c77$e5559310$6cdc10ac@jecw2k1
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

>
> Have we made a decision on this? I think we should apply it.
>

Well I'd vote for that ;-)

If Peter feels strongly about *not* including PQescapeBytea, I'll remove it
and resubmit the patch, but I would like to see it in there myself. Just let
me know want you want me to do.

I haven't seen any comments one way or the other on the rest of the patch,
but again, I'd really like to see it applied. The backend functions are all
per SQL99 (section 4.3 Binary strings, and 8.5 <like predicate>).

-- Joe

In response to

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2001-09-13 18:10:31 Re: SQLCODE==-209
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2001-09-13 16:57:43 Re: Bytea string operator support