Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Bytea string operator support

From: "Joe Conway" <joseph(dot)conway(at)home(dot)com>
To: "Bruce Momjian" <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Peter Eisentraut" <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Bytea string operator support
Date: 2001-09-13 17:16:54
Message-ID: 001201c13c77$e5559310$6cdc10ac@jecw2k1 (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-patches
> Have we made a decision on this?  I think we should apply it.

Well I'd vote for that ;-)

If Peter feels strongly about *not* including PQescapeBytea, I'll remove it
and resubmit the patch, but I would like to see it in there myself. Just let
me know want you want me to do.

I haven't seen any comments one way or the other on the rest of the patch,
but again, I'd really like to see it applied. The backend functions are all
per SQL99 (section 4.3 Binary strings, and 8.5 <like predicate>).

-- Joe

In response to

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2001-09-13 18:10:31
Subject: Re: SQLCODE==-209
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2001-09-13 16:57:43
Subject: Re: Bytea string operator support

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group