Re: ADO and ODBC: More

From: "NTB Technical Support" <techsupport(at)ntb(dot)org(dot)uk>
To: "Hiroshi Inoue" <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: <pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: ADO and ODBC: More
Date: 2001-07-08 09:43:41
Message-ID: 001201c10792$799349c0$2780bcc3@northeast.co.uk
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-interfaces

> > >> I'd write it off as broken code in ADO, and program around it by not
> > >> using column names that require quoting. Ugly answer, but it's not
> > >> clear that you have an alternative (short of waiting for an ADO fix).

Thanks for the various inputs - looks like this is what we'll have to do.

> ADO doesn't need ODBC essentially and M$ SQL Server has
> its own OLE DB provider. PostgreSQL doesn't have its OLE
> DB provider implementation yet

Just out of curiosity, I ran the ATL OLE DB Provider wizard in VC++ to see
what might be involved in doing this; soon thought better of it....

Tim

In response to

Browse pgsql-interfaces by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message markMLl.pgsql-interfaces 2001-07-08 11:36:15 Getting info on "Max LongVarChar" under ODBC
Previous Message Steve Wampler 2001-07-06 16:29:57 Too much data received?