| From: | Mark Hollomon <mhh(at)mindspring(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Philip Warner <pjw(at)rhyme(dot)com(dot)au> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: CREATE MODULE (was: Coping with 'C' vs 'newC' function language names) |
| Date: | 2000-11-14 01:33:54 |
| Message-ID: | 00111320335400.12247@jupiter |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Saturday 11 November 2000 20:30, Tom Lane wrote:
> Philip Warner <pjw(at)rhyme(dot)com(dot)au> writes:
>
> > Might even be able to implement a 'CREATE MODULE' which loads an
> > object, enquires about functions in the module, and creates function
> > entries based on information returned from pg_fmgr_info...
>
> That could work ... something to think about for the future, anyway.
I proposed this some time ago, even wrote up a semiformal proposal.
I was told at the time it was a bad idea.
The only objection I remember of the top of my head had to do with set-uid.
I apporached the other way. LOAD MODULE would call a well defined
entry point which could then use SPI or some other facility to create
whatever. I saw it as a way to distribute types and even whole applications.
--
Mark Hollomon
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2000-11-14 01:45:42 | Re: Re: [PATCHES] PostgreSQL virtual hosting support |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2000-11-14 01:16:42 | Re: Re: [PATCHES] PostgreSQL virtual hosting support |