Re: [HACKERS] A GUC to prevent leader processes from running subplans?

From: Jesper Pedersen <jesper(dot)pedersen(at)redhat(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] A GUC to prevent leader processes from running subplans?
Date: 2017-11-15 13:35:26
Message-ID: 000f92d6-f623-95a5-b341-46e2c0495cea@redhat.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 11/15/2017 08:28 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 12:28 AM, Thomas Munro
> <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>> Thanks. You're right. Rebased and updated to describe what "off" does.
>
> Committed. I noticed that you didn't add the new GUC to
> postgresql.conf.sample, so I did that. But then I thought it didn't
> really belong in the section you put it, so I moved it to
> RESOURCES_ASYNCHRONOUS.
>

Small typo.

Best regards,
Jesper

Attachment Content-Type Size
typo.patch text/x-patch 719 bytes

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2017-11-15 13:37:11 Re: [HACKERS] Parallel Hash take II
Previous Message Robert Haas 2017-11-15 13:28:34 Re: [HACKERS] A GUC to prevent leader processes from running subplans?