From: | "Eric Mueller" <eric(at)themepark(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "'PostgreSQL general mailing list'" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | RE: RE: Re: MySQL and PostgreSQL speed compare |
Date: | 2001-01-03 00:20:53 |
Message-ID: | 000f01c0751b$09441f00$d534a9ac@vaio |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-docs pgsql-general |
I'm happy to contribute once I feel like I've got something to offer, which
I won't know until I have the lay of the land, and that's the problem. As a
long-time coder picking up postgresql for the first time, I'm baffled by
what seems to be a lack of detailed documentation for something so
fundamental as the built-in functions. Do the docs for the functions even
exist? Are they in the dist but not published on the web site? Zen-like
riddles and causes-in-need-of-aid aside, any hints to the answer for such a
basic question would help me get started with what seems like a very
powerful tool.
-----Original Message-----
From: pgsql-general-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
[mailto:pgsql-general-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org]On Behalf Of GH
Sent: Tuesday, January 02, 2001 3:53 PM
To: Eric Mueller
Cc: 'PostgreSQL general mailing list'
Subject: Re: RE: Re: MySQL and PostgreSQL speed compare
On Tue, Jan 02, 2001 at 02:47:05PM -0800, some SMTP stream spewed forth:
> ...another advantage I've seen is the documentation! MySQL has its
functions
> clearly documented on the mysql.com site; I not able to find detailed docs
> for the pgsql functions anywhere on the postgresql site.
I ask you the same question I ask myself in such situations:
How much documentation have I written?
How much have I aided the Cause?
gh
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: pgsql-general-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
> [mailto:pgsql-general-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org]On Behalf Of Bruce Momjian
> Sent: Tuesday, January 02, 2001 1:08 PM
> To: kientzle(at)acm(dot)org
> Cc: PostgreSQL general mailing list
> Subject: Re: Re: MySQL and PostgreSQL speed compare
>
> > One big advantage of MySQL over PostgreSQL
> > right now is ease of upgrading. Upgrading
> > MySQL just requires shutting down the old
> > one and starting the new; PostgreSQL requires
> > a more involved process to migrate all of
> > your data. (Of course, upgrading your DB
> > is never a simple matter, but at least
> > MySQL tries to make it less painful.)
>
> Yes, that is a good point. We are clearly fixing/improving the storage
> system, while MySQL has been able to keep the same one for many years.
>
> --
> Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
> pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
> + If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
> + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dominic J. Eidson | 2001-01-03 00:39:17 | Re: RE: Re: MySQL and PostgreSQL speed compare |
Previous Message | GH | 2001-01-02 23:53:26 | Re: RE: Re: MySQL and PostgreSQL speed compare |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jan Wieck | 2001-01-03 00:21:14 | Re: Re: Failed Statements within Transactions |
Previous Message | Artur Pietruk | 2001-01-03 00:20:43 | Re: ECPG could not connect to the database. |