RE: [HACKERS] PREPARE

From: "Taral" <taral(at)cyberjunkie(dot)com>
To: "Hannu Krosing" <hannu(at)trust(dot)ee>
Cc: <pgsql-hackers(at)hub(dot)org>, <pgsql-interfaces(at)hub(dot)org>
Subject: RE: [HACKERS] PREPARE
Date: 1998-11-17 18:36:55
Message-ID: 000f01be1259$40542c00$8a14f7d0@taral.dobiecenter.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-interfaces

> > Is the current transaction model adequate or do we need nested
> > transactions ?
>
> Err... I didn't answer your question, did I? The COS Transaction Service
> implements nested transactions.

Aha... finally found the line I was looking for:

"An implementation of the Transaction Service is not required to support
nested transactions."

Taral

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter T Mount 1998-11-17 18:40:01 Re: [HACKERS] PREPARE
Previous Message David Hartwig 1998-11-17 18:33:23 Re: [HACKERS] PREPARE

Browse pgsql-interfaces by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter T Mount 1998-11-17 18:40:01 Re: [HACKERS] PREPARE
Previous Message David Hartwig 1998-11-17 18:33:23 Re: [HACKERS] PREPARE