From: | "Jeff Hoffmann" <jeff(at)remapcorp(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] CORBA interface in backend? |
Date: | 1998-11-11 20:43:25 |
Message-ID: | 000d01be0db3$ef505940$c525c4ce@remapcorp.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
>On Wed, 11 Nov 1998, Michael Meskes wrote:
>
>> This is where it gets tricky. Which existing ORB are you thinking about?
I
>> know of only two free ORBs: The Gnome one (orbit) and mico. Orbit is
GPLed
>> so there's a problem with PostgreSQL becoming GPLed. However, as long as
>> PostgreSQL remain free under the BSD license that should be okay. But we
>> defintely lose the possibility to make this a commercial product. Not
that
>> we want to do so.
>
there's also omniORB (http://www.orl.co.uk) which i found when i was looking
for vnc. haven't used it, don't know much about it, but i believe it's also
LGPL'd (maybe GPL'd)
> Both are GPLd then, as I'm doing work with MICO and FreeBSD, and
>just checked their license files.
>
> Now, here is where *I* get confused. MICO uses LGPL for its
>libraries, so does this mean that the ORB hooks could be added where
>applicable, still under the BSD license, but in order to compile it in,
>mico's libraries would have to be installed first? Its something we
>check for/do with the tcl stuff...
>
> So, could the ORB hooks be added with a config option of
>'--enable-orb' *without* the requirement for adding in any GPLd code?
an abstract orb interface? sounds good as long as someone else is doing the
work.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvaro C P Barbosa | 1998-11-12 01:09:42 | Questions about PostgreSQL |
Previous Message | The Hermit Hacker | 1998-11-11 19:30:06 | Re: [HACKERS] CORBA interface in backend? |