RES: Another question about composite types

From: "Rodrigo Sakai" <rodrigo(dot)sakai(at)zanthus(dot)com(dot)br>
To: "'Richard Broersma Jr'" <rabroersma(at)yahoo(dot)com>, <pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: RES: Another question about composite types
Date: 2006-11-13 19:13:48
Message-ID: 000c01c70757$dbe70c90$4700a8c0@TREEZANTHUS
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-sql

I know that if I create a table salary that references my employee table
works! But I'm trying to work with the composite type concept!

Thinking in Object-Oriented Programming (OOP) I have a class employee that
is composed by the class salary among other things! Like:

Class salary {
private float value;
private date validity;
}

Class employee {
private int ID;
private String name;
private salary[] sal;
}

So I'd like to map these classes to PostgreSQL. I think nested tables are
one of the advantages of object-relational databases. And it works if I
think in just one salary for each employee. But I want to keep all salary
history for each employee. Is there any way?

-----Mensagem original-----
De: Richard Broersma Jr [mailto:rabroersma(at)yahoo(dot)com]
Enviada em: segunda-feira, 13 de novembro de 2006 14:46
Para: rodrigo(dot)sakai(at)zanthus(dot)com(dot)br; pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org
Assunto: Re: [SQL] Another question about composite types

> CREATE TYPE t_salary AS (Value numeric(10,2), Validity date);
> CREATE TABLE employee (id int, name varchar(30), salary t_salary[]);
>
> That is, I need an array of composite type and searching on google I found
> that is impossible to do it! Is it really impossible? Anyone have do it ?

Why not use a conventional table to hold this information that references
your employee table?

Regards,

Richard Broersma Jr.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-sql by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stuart Brooks 2006-11-14 12:50:49 Re: Constraint on multicolumn index
Previous Message Andreas Kretschmer 2006-11-13 19:06:36 Re: drop a check