Re: Call for port reports

From: "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Call for port reports
Date: 2003-10-27 00:10:49
Message-ID: 000b01c39c1e$c728d600$6401a8c0@DUNSLANE
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


----- Original Message -----
From: "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
To: "Bruce Momjian" <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>; <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Sent: Sunday, October 26, 2003 3:22 PM
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Call for port reports

>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Dave Page
> > Sent: 26 October 2003 17:34
> > To: Bruce Momjian
> > Cc: peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net; pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
> > Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Call for port reports
> >
> >
> > > No problem --- the port is already marked as working --- this is a
> > > known problem with the parallel tests.
> >
> > No it's not, that's what I'm saying. Normally the tests
> > finish with a few failures (because Cygwin can't create
> > enough sockets). I'm seeing a full blown hang.
> >
>
> OK, cleaned up and rebuilt & it looks OK now (well, as OK as it ever
> does on XP Pro).
>

I am seeing these hangs consistently (but not always in the same place) on
XPHE running on a P4.

uname: CYGWIN_NT-5.1 DUNSLANE 1.5.5(0.94/3/2) 2003-09-20 16:31 i686 unknown
unknown Cygwin

cheers

andrew

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Gaetano Mendola 2003-10-27 00:22:04 BEGIN vs START TRANSACTION
Previous Message Jan Wieck 2003-10-27 00:09:19 Re: Still a few flaws in configure's default CFLAGS selection