| From: | "Hiroshi Inoue" <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Chris Bitmead" <chris(at)bitmead(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "Postgres Hackers List" <hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>, "pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-patches(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
| Subject: | RE: [HACKERS] CLASSOID patch |
| Date: | 2000-06-26 02:51:01 |
| Message-ID: | 000b01bfdf19$5d2140a0$2801007e@tpf.co.jp |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
> -----Original Message-----
> From: pgsql-hackers-owner(at)hub(dot)org [mailto:pgsql-hackers-owner(at)hub(dot)org]On
> Behalf Of Chris Bitmead
>
> Attached is a first attempt at implementing the classoid feature. It
> works! Can the postgres gurus comment if I've done it right and point
> out any problems. A lot of it was guess work so I'm sure it can be
> cleaned up some.
>
The points I've noticed are the following.
1) It seems not preferable to add an entry *relation* which is of
Relation type in HeapTupleData. Relation OID seems to be
sufficient for your purpose.
2) The change in optimizer/path/tidpath.c seems to have
no meaning.
Sorry,I have no time to check your patch more now.
Regards.
Hiroshi Inoue
Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2000-06-26 03:07:56 | Re: About the pid and opts files |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2000-06-26 01:41:58 | Re: [HACKERS] CLASSOID patch |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2000-06-26 03:18:12 | Re: RE: [HACKERS] CLASSOID patch |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2000-06-26 01:41:58 | Re: [HACKERS] CLASSOID patch |