RE: [HACKERS] SQL vs. OQL

From: "Taral" <taral(at)cyberjunkie(dot)com>
To: "Thomas G(dot) Lockhart" <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>
Cc: "Hannu Krosing" <hannu(at)trust(dot)ee>, <pgsql-hackers(at)hub(dot)org>
Subject: RE: [HACKERS] SQL vs. OQL
Date: 1998-11-17 18:12:23
Message-ID: 000b01be1255$d2e20320$8a14f7d0@taral.dobiecenter.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

AFAICT, there's an agreement to eventually merge the query parts of OQL and
SQL so that there's only one query language. You did check the ODMG page?

Taral

> -----Original Message-----
> From: tgl(at)mythos(dot)jpl(dot)nasa(dot)gov [mailto:tgl(at)mythos(dot)jpl(dot)nasa(dot)gov]On Behalf
> Of Thomas G. Lockhart
> Sent: Monday, November 16, 1998 9:40 PM
> To: Taral
> Cc: Hannu Krosing; pgsql-hackers(at)hub(dot)org
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] SQL vs. OQL
>
>
> > Read http://www.jcc.com/sql_odmg_convergence.html and follow the links
>
> The pages and some of the links seem to have frozen about a year ago.
> Anything still active on these efforts?
>
> - Tom
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message dkelson-list-pgsql-hackers 1998-11-17 18:17:33 Re: [HACKERS] New to PostgreSQL, is this a DoS?
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 1998-11-17 16:16:52 Re: [HACKERS] PREPARE